Trustee vs delagate

December 3, by maxbloom1 Max Bloom Section 12 A major issue that must be considered when we think about the way we want the people who we choose to represent us to behave is whether they should act as trustees or as delegates. These diametrically opposed methods of representation have the capacity to drastically impact the way people are represented in their legislatures and can put the US style of government anywhere on the spectrum from true democracy to oligarchy. It is debatable which style is preferable, but judging by his views on individual opinions, John Stuart Mill clearly prefers a trustee to a delegate.

Trustee vs delagate

Trustee vs delagate

Some have centered on public participation in public sector budgeting. We have featured, among others, a deliberative poll in Zeguo Township, Chinaparticipatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, Braziland a book on participatory budgeting with examples from six countries, including India, Mexico, South Africa, and Croatia.

We have also talked about the much touted success of newspaper publication of education sector budgets in Uganda. InBurke argued that as a trustee of the public interest, an elected official owes his or her!

Trustee vs. Delegate | Intro to Political Theory Blog

Under this view, an elected delegate must represent and vote in line with the will of the people she or he represents.

But government and legislation are matters of reason and judgment, and not of inclination; and what sort of reason is that, in which the determination precedes the discussion; in which one set of men deliberate, and another decide; and where those who form the conclusion are perhaps three hundred miles distant from those who hear the arguments?

In the participatory budgeting models mentioned above, citizens do deliberate. And citizens, not just elected officials, are able to exercise their own reason and judgment.

Report Abuse

Of course, elected officials, especially those in the executive branch, must harness the political will to see the process through.

If they do what is necessary for citizens to be well informed, these officials can serve as trustees of participatory processes as well as delegates of their outcomes.The delegate model of representation often applies to situations in which the represented bodies are independent entities with conflicting interests.

The trustee model of representation is the norm for representative bodies within a nation. The delegate and trustee models of . Delegate Model vs Trustee Model Essay also be utilized when making decisions about Taxes.

Trustee vs. Delegate

Another issues in America where the Delegate Model should be . The trustee is the person who presently has the authority to carry on the business of the trust. If the trustee dies, resigns or is for some reason unable to continue their du ties then a.

The trustee model of representation is a model for how we should understand the role of representatives, and is frequently contrasted with the delegate model of representation.

Constituents elect their representatives as ' trustees ' (or 'entrust' them) for their constituency.

Trustee vs Delegate - What's the difference? | WikiDiff

Nov 22,  · Best Answer: Delegates are just that, people you can delegate to and who will do you bidding. Delegates bring home the pork for districts and follow everything the district says.

A trustee is someone who you have to trust will represent your best interest when hard issues come Resolved. In a democratic government, functions of representation can sometimes become skewed or misunderstood. I will examine the different institutions of government including the legislature, the executive, the bureaucracy, and the courts pointing to their differences in trustee vs.

delegate functions of representation.

Yahoo ist jetzt Teil von Oath